Statutory Interpretation Bundle

This case brief provides an analysis of Sea Shepherd Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2013) 212 FCR 252. The focus of this brief is statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of Samad v District Court of New South Wales (2002) 209 CLR 140. The focus of this brief is statutory interpretation, specifically, the difference between obligations and discretions

This case brief provides an analysis of Rodway v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 515. The focus of this brief is presumptions in statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of R v Boucher [1995] 1 VR 110 . The focus of this brief is statutory interpretation, specifically on the use of extrinsic materials.

This case brief provides an analysis of Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355. The focus of this brief is statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of Proudman v Dayman (1941) 67 CLR 536 . The focus of this brief is on presumptions in statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273. The focus of this brief is on statutory interpretation, specifically statutory construction involving international law.

This case brief provides an analysis of Humphries v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129  . The focus of this brief is on statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of He Kaw Teh v R (1985) 157 CLR 523. The focus of this brief is on presumptions in statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2013) 294 ALR 404. The focus of this brief is on statutory interpretation.

This case brief provides an analysis of Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129 (The ‘Engineer’s Case’). The focus of this brief is statutory construction.

This case brief provides an analysis of Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562 – what was a landmark High Court of Australia decision. The focus of this brief on presumptions in statutory interpretation.